X-ray troubleshooting: What you see, what to try, when to escalate

X-ray troubleshooting: What you see, what to try, when to escalate

For radiographers and students in general radiography, including mobile, ward and theatre work with DR and CR. Image faults, equipment problems, patient problems and safety incidents, each with what you see, what to try first and when to stop and escalate.

Free guide · Updated October 2026 · 46 problems covered

On this pageFind your problemImage looks wrongEquipment and systemPatient and workflowSafety incidentsSources

Arrest, a fall, equipment striking someone, or the wrong patient exposed: stop troubleshooting and follow your local emergency or incident procedure.

ArrestFallEquipment strikes a patientMobile collisionWrong patient or wrong exposurePregnancy found after exposure

Key points
  • In digital radiography the image looks right across a wide range of exposures: check the exposure index or deviation index, and judge noise on a good display, rather than trusting brightness.
  • Most rejected digital images are for positioning or anatomy cut off. Check the request, the side, the collimation and the position before exposing.
  • Do not repeat an image only because the deviation index is high; repeat an overexposed image when relevant anatomy is saturated. Reprocess before re-exposing when processing is the problem.
  • Before exposing, check the console shows the right patient, examination and detector, selected and ready: an exposure on the wrong or uninitialised detector gives dose without a usable image.
  • A fault on every image, or on a QC image, is likely an equipment, grid or calibration fault: stop, record it and report it.
  • Wrong patient, wrong side, an unplanned repeat or a pregnancy found after the exposure: tell the radiologist and report it. A medical physicist estimates the dose, and your regional rules decide who must be told.
Explain it simply
  • Digital X-rays always look bright enough, so a number on the screen shows whether the dose was right.
  • Most retakes happen because the body part was not quite in the right place, so checking before pressing the button matters most.
  • A picture that is a bit overexposed is not retaken for that alone; a picture with missing detail is.
  • Check the machine is ready for the right patient and the right detector before taking the picture.
  • If the same mark shows on every picture, the machine is at fault, not the patient.
  • If the wrong person or part is X-rayed, it is reported openly, the dose is worked out, and the patient is told.

A guide only: follow your departmental protocols, your radiologist and medical physicist, and your regional radiation rules. Fluoroscopy and C-arm troubleshooting will have its own page.

Find your problem

Steps in each card run from cheapest and lowest-risk first. Terms are vendor-neutral; your operator manual gives the names your system uses.

Image looks wrong

Image faults in DR and CR. In digital radiography the image’s brightness is set by processing, so exposure errors show up as noise or in the exposure indicator, not as a dark or light image. With digital systems, positioning is the commonest reason images are rejected. A pattern that could be disease is checked another way before anyone acts on it; a fault that appears on every image, or on a QC image, goes to Equipment and system.

Sources: AAPM TG-116 2009; Atkinson 2020; Hofmann 2015; ACR DR PP 2022

Exposure index or deviation index out of range
What you see
The deviation index (DI) or the vendor’s exposure index is outside your department’s range, although the image may look normal; or the image looks noisy.
Why it happens
The exposure index (EI) measures the signal at the detector for the image; the target EI is set per body part and view, and the DI shows how far this exposure is from the target (0 on target, positive above, negative below). Processing makes over- and underexposed images look similar in brightness, so an overexposed image can look good while giving the patient more dose than needed (dose creep). An underexposed image looks noisy.
Try first
  1. Check you chose the right body part and view: the wrong selection uses the wrong target and gives a wrong DI.
  2. Check whether something upset the reading: tight or uneven collimation, a prosthesis, a shield in the field, unusual positioning, or (on CR) a long delay before reading the plate.
  3. Low DI: zoom and pan to judge noise on a good display; a noisy image may need a repeat after review.
  4. High DI: do not repeat because the DI is high. Repeat an overexposed image only if relevant anatomy is saturated (clipped), see Saturation.
  5. Correct the technique for the next image, and log extreme DI values for review.
Stop and escalate when
The DI is far out of range without an obvious cause, or out of range on many images: tell the lead radiographer and medical physicist (exposure, AEC or calibration may need checking).
Where sources differ
Action limits. AAPM TG-116 (2009) gave a target DI range of -0.5 to +0.5, with a repeat below -3 and management follow-up above +3. AAPM TG-232 (2018, abstract) found these too strict for clinical practice and recommends site-specific action limits at 1 and 2 standard deviations of each site’s own DI data; the ACR practice parameter (2022) says each practice sets its own limits and an extreme DI alone should not prompt an immediate repeat. Follow your department’s limits.
Explain it simply

Digital systems make every picture look bright enough, so the computer gives a number showing how much X-ray actually reached the detector. Too low and the picture is grainy; too high and the patient got more radiation than needed.

Why it matters: Watching the number is the main way to catch slowly creeping doses that the pictures hide.

Sources: AAPM TG-116 2009; Seibert 2011; AAPM TG-232 2018; ACR DR PP 2022; AAPM Report 93; Mothiram 2014; Kowalczyk 2009; Schaefer-Prokop 2008

Grainy image (quantum mottle)
What you see
The image looks grainy or speckled, especially in thick or dense regions; fine low-contrast detail is hard to see.
Why it happens
Noise comes mainly from the random arrival of X-ray photons: too few photons reach the detector. Causes include too low an exposure for the patient’s size, the wrong technique or AEC set-up, or an image displayed on a monitor that hides or exaggerates noise.
Try first
  1. Check the DI (see Exposure index) and the technique against the protocol for the patient’s size.
  2. Judge noise on a diagnostic-quality display, zoomed in; acquisition and QC monitors are often not calibrated and can mislead.
  3. If AEC was used, check the right chambers were selected and covered by the anatomy (see AEC problems).
  4. If the noise hides what the request needs, a repeat with corrected technique may be justified after review.
Stop and escalate when
Noise on images of every patient with an unchanged technique: report it for a QC check of the detector and AEC.
Explain it simply

An X-ray picture is built from counted particles of light. Too few, and the picture looks speckled like a photo taken in the dark.

Why it matters: Noise can hide a small fracture or a faint shadow on the lung.

Sources: IAEA DRP 2014; AAPM TG-116 2009; Seibert 2011; ACR DR PP 2022

Burned-out areas (saturation or clipping)
What you see
Areas of the image show no detail at all (burned out or clipped), often after a high exposure.
Why it happens
When the detector or its electronics receive more signal than they can record, every pixel in that area is forced to the maximum value, so the information there is lost and cannot be recovered by processing.
Try first
  1. Check the technique and the DI: saturation follows a large overexposure.
  2. Check the right body part, view and processing were chosen; wrong processing can also make areas look washed out (see Processing).
  3. If relevant anatomy is saturated, a repeat with corrected technique is justified; it is the main reason to repeat an overexposed digital image.
Stop and escalate when
Saturation at ordinary exposures: report it, as the detector or reader may need checking.
Explain it simply

Like a camera pointed at the sun, a detector can be flooded so badly that part of the picture has no detail left.

Why it matters: Burned-out areas cannot be fixed afterwards, so the image has to be taken again.

Sources: AAPM TG-116 2009; AAPM Report 93; ACR DR PP 2022; Mothiram 2014

Grid lines or Moiré pattern
What you see
Fine parallel lines across the image, or a coarse wavy interference pattern (Moiré), sometimes visible only on thumbnails or at certain zoom levels.
Why it happens
A stationary grid’s lead strips can show as lines, and their regular pattern can interfere with the detector’s pixel grid or the CR reader’s scan lines, producing Moiré. Moving (reciprocating) grids blur the strips out. A damaged grid also causes artefacts.
Try first
  1. Check the image at full size: Moiré that appears only on a reduced thumbnail is a display effect.
  2. If a stationary grid was used, check it is the type your system specifies for that detector; on CR, grid lines should run across the reader’s scan direction.
  3. Check the Bucky grid moved during the exposure (see Bucky and grid).
  4. Inspect the grid for dents or damage.
Stop and escalate when
Lines appear with the correct grid, or the grid is damaged: take the grid or Bucky out of use and report it.
Explain it simply

A grid is a sheet of very thin lead strips that soak up scattered X-rays. If it stays still, its stripes can show on the picture or clash with the detector’s own pattern.

Why it matters: Lines across an image can hide fine detail or be mistaken for a fracture line.

Sources: IAEA DRP 2014; AAPM Report 93; AAPM TG-150 2024; Hegde 2018

Image lighter or noisier at one side or both edges (grid cut-off) Can mimic pathology
What you see
Part of the image has less signal than it should: more noise or lower density towards one or both sides, or across the whole image, especially on bedside chest images taken with a grid.
Why it happens
A focused grid’s strips are angled to match the beam at one distance. At the wrong distance (off-focus), the sides lose signal while the centre is unchanged; off-centre to the grid (lateral decentring), signal falls evenly across the whole image. A slightly tilted grid acts like lateral decentring; a larger tilt, or being off-centre and at the wrong distance together, makes the loss uneven, with one side noisier or lighter than the other. A grid used upside down also causes cut-off. Mobile grids are often hard to align, and in bedside chest work a tilt of more than 3 degrees can lead to interpretation errors (Fischer).
Try first
  1. Check the source-to-image distance matches the grid’s focal range marked on the grid.
  2. Centre the beam to the grid, and keep the beam at right angles to the grid; for bedside work, check the grid is not tilted under the patient.
  3. Check the grid is the right way up.
  4. Consider whether a grid is needed for that patient and view.
Stop and escalate when
Cut-off on fixed equipment at the correct distance and centring: report it, as a detent, the grid mounting or the grid itself may be faulty.
Can mimic pathology
Uneven cut-off can change the apparent darkness of one lung and imitate disease; compare areas outside the chest.
Explain it simply

The grid’s strips are tilted to point at the X-ray tube. If the tube is at the wrong distance or angle, the strips block the X-rays they should let through.

Why it matters: One lung looking darker than the other because of the grid could lead to a wrong diagnosis.

Sources: IAEA DRP 2014; Gauntt 2010; Fischer 1992; EUR 16260 1996; AAPM TG-150 2024; AAPM Report 93

Uneven brightness or noise along a long field (anode heel effect)
What you see
Signal falls off along the length of a large field, towards the anode end, for example along a femur, spine or long-length image.
Why it happens
X-rays produced deep in the anode are absorbed more on the anode side, so the beam is less intense there. The effect is often barely noticeable in radiographs; in digital systems post-processing is assumed to compensate for much of it, although it may also alter the image’s appearance.
Try first
  1. For long fields, use the SID and field size your protocol sets.
  2. Follow your department’s positioning protocol for tube orientation; the evidence for a particular orientation in digital radiography is inconclusive (below).
Good to know
A systematic review (Kusk and colleagues, 2021) found that the evidence neither proves nor disproves an effect on image quality in digital radiography; one phantom study of the AP pelvis found lower gonad dose with the feet towards the anode, with visual image quality unchanged but signal-to-noise changed.
Explain it simply

The X-ray beam is a little weaker at one end than the other. On a long picture you may see one end slightly grainier.

Why it matters: Knowing the effect explains a gradual change along a long bone so it is not mistaken for disease.

Sources: IAEA DRP 2014; Kusk 2021; Mraity 2020

Blurring from movement
What you see
Edges are blurred or doubled; on the chest, the heart borders or diaphragm are blurred; on long exposures, fine bone detail is lost.
Why it happens
The patient or the part moved during the exposure: breathing, pain, tremor, a child or a confused patient. Longer exposure times, for example with a very small focal spot or low kV, raise the risk.
Try first
  1. Explain the breathing instruction and practise it; give the instruction and expose at the right moment.
  2. Support the part with pads, sandbags or immobilisation devices so the patient does not have to work to keep still.
  3. Use a shorter exposure time where your protocol allows (the right focal spot and kV for the region).
  4. For a child or a patient who cannot keep still, see Children and Cannot stand or hold position.
Stop and escalate when
Motion keeps spoiling images: ask the radiologist which view matters most before repeating.
Explain it simply

Like a photo of someone who moved, the X-ray picture blurs if the body moves while it is being taken.

Why it matters: A blurred image can hide a fracture, and every repeat adds dose.

Sources: IAEA DRP 2014; ACR DR PP 2022; Schaefer-Prokop 2008; Atkinson 2020; EUR 16260 1996; ASMIRT PPS 2018

Ghost image or double exposure on a CR plate Can mimic pathology
What you see
Another image, outline or object faintly visible on a CR image: a previous patient’s anatomy, a lead marker, or the outline of a high-exposure area.
Why it happens
The reader removes only part of the stored signal; the plate is then erased with bright light. Erasure can be incomplete after a very high exposure, or the plate may not have been erased before reuse, or it was exposed twice. Background radiation also builds up on plates left unused.
Try first
  1. Erase plates before use if you are unsure of their status, and use one exposure per plate.
  2. After a very heavy exposure, erase the plate again (possibly more than once) before reuse.
  3. Erase infrequently used plates on the schedule your QC programme sets.
Stop and escalate when
Ghosts persist after erasure, or appear on many plates: take the plates or reader out of use and report it.
Can mimic pathology
A ghost from a previous image has imitated a fetus in the abdomen on a chest film; residual images can imitate disease.
Explain it simply

A CR plate is wiped clean with bright light after each use. If it is not wiped properly, the old picture shows through the new one.

Why it matters: A leftover picture from another patient could be mistaken for something inside this patient.

Sources: AAPM Report 93; IAEA DRP 2014; Hegde 2018; IAEA HHS 47

Ghosting or lag on a DR detector
What you see
A faint residual image of a previous exposure, an object or a collimated edge on a later DR image.
Why it happens
Lag is signal carried over into the next image; ghosting is a change in detector gain left by a previous image. Both are worst after very large exposures, heavy exposure of lead markers, or repeated small collimated fields.
Try first
  1. Note the time, the previous exposure and what showed.
  2. Allow time before the next exposure if your manufacturer advises it, and avoid unnecessary very high exposures to the detector.
  3. Run the detector’s calibration if it is a user task on your system and the manufacturer recommends it.
Stop and escalate when
The ghost persists or appears on clinical images: report it to service and the medical physicist.
Explain it simply

A digital detector can hold a faint memory of the last strong picture, which can show up on the next one.

Why it matters: A leftover shadow could be mistaken for something real.

Sources: IAEA DRP 2014; AAPM TG-150 2024; ACR DR PP 2022; EC RP 162

Spots, lines or scratches on CR images
What you see
White specks or spots, fine lines or scratches in the same place on images from one plate; a straight line across images from one reader; image signal lower than expected after a delay.
Why it happens
Dust and dirt on the plate, scratches or damage to the phosphor, dust in the reader’s light-collection optics, and fading of the stored image when the plate is left before reading (a typical plate loses about a quarter of its signal between 10 minutes and 8 hours after exposure).
Try first
  1. Identify the plate (the artefact follows the plate) or the reader (the artefact appears on every plate).
  2. Clean the plate only with the manufacturer’s approved method; erase it and re-check.
  3. Read plates promptly after exposure.
  4. Withdraw a plate that cannot be cleaned or is damaged.
Stop and escalate when
Lines appear on every plate through one reader: take the reader out of use and call service.
Explain it simply

CR plates are like reusable photo plates. Dust and scratches on them, or dirt inside the reader, show up as marks on every picture.

Why it matters: A speck or line in the wrong place could be mistaken for a foreign body or fracture.

Sources: AAPM Report 93; IAEA HHS 47; IAEA DRP 2014; Kowalczyk 2009

Lines, dead pixels or blotches on DR images
What you see
A fixed line, cluster of dead pixels, rectangular blocks or non-uniform areas in the same place on every image from one detector, or an outline of an object that was not there.
Why it happens
Detectors are corrected for faulty elements and uneven gain by a calibration map. The map can become less effective over time, calibration can be done wrongly (an object left in the beam during calibration is burned into every later image), and detectors can be damaged, for example by a drop.
Try first
  1. Check the same defect on a flat-field or QC image.
  2. Run the detector’s calibration if it is a user task on your system, as the manufacturer specifies, with nothing in the beam.
  3. Note the detector’s identity, especially with several wireless detectors.
Stop and escalate when
The defect persists after calibration, or the detector was dropped: take it out of use, report it, and tell the radiologists so they can judge its effect on clinical images.
Explain it simply

A digital detector is a grid of millions of tiny sensors. If some fail or the correction map is wrong, lines or blocks appear on every picture.

Why it matters: A dead line could be mistaken for a fracture, or hide one.

Sources: IAEA HHS 47; ACR DR PP 2022; AAPM TG-150 2024; ACPSEM 2024; Willis 2011; Walz-Flannigan 2018

Steps or gaps on stitched long-length images Can mimic pathology
What you see
A step, gap, overlap or false line where sections of a long-length (whole spine or leg) image are joined.
Why it happens
Long-length images are made from several exposures joined by software, and an error in the merging step misaligns the sections. In one reported case the merging error made a normal vertebra look fractured.
Try first
  1. Use the system’s long-length method as it is set up; the ACR expects the equipment to join images without exposing sections twice.
  2. Keep the patient still between exposures, with the positioning aids your protocol specifies (a general step).
  3. Check the joins on the stitched image before the patient leaves.
  4. Label stitched images and mark the overlap regions, as Benes and colleagues recommend, so readers know where joins are.
Stop and escalate when
A join looks like a fracture or a broken device: tell the radiologist; focused images of that level may be needed.
Can mimic pathology
Stitching errors have imitated a vertebral fracture and a broken shunt catheter.
Explain it simply

A long picture of the spine is made by gluing several pictures together. If the patient moves, the joins do not line up.

Why it matters: A false step in the spine could look like a broken bone.

Sources: Benes 2023; Hodnett 2025; ACR DR PP 2022

Faint outlines from behind the detector (backscatter)
What you see
A faint image of an object or structure that lies behind the detector, such as part of the table, holder or cassette.
Why it happens
X-rays passing through the detector scatter back from material behind it. Cassettes and detectors have backing to limit this, and some older CR cassettes lacked adequate backscatter control.
Try first
  1. Check what was behind the detector during the exposure, and remove it or use the correct holder.
  2. Collimate to the area needed, which reduces scatter.
Stop and escalate when
The pattern appears with the correct set-up: report the cassette or detector for checking.
Explain it simply

Some X-rays bounce back off things behind the detector, adding a faint shadow of those things to the picture.

Why it matters: Recognising backscatter stops a strange shape being taken for something inside the patient.

Sources: IAEA DRP 2014; AAPM Report 93; Walz-Flannigan 2018

Image too light, too dark or washed out after processing
What you see
The image looks washed out, too light or too dark, with poor contrast, or has halos around metal or edges, although the exposure was right.
Why it happens
Digital images are processed for the body part chosen. The wrong examination or processing menu, a failed recognition of the collimated area (histogram analysis), or strong edge enhancement can mis-scale the image; edge enhancement can create halos.
Try first
  1. Check the examination and view selected match the image.
  2. Reprocess with the right menu, or correct the collimation or region of interest, rather than repeating the exposure.
  3. Do not change processing parameters yourself beyond the options your department allows; changes are made with the applications specialist and radiologists.
Stop and escalate when
Many images look wrong after a software change: report it to the lead radiographer and physicist.
Explain it simply

The computer adjusts each picture to look right for the body part you chose. Choose the wrong part and it adjusts it wrongly.

Why it matters: Reprocessing fixes the picture without giving the patient another dose.

Sources: ACR DR PP 2022; AAPM Report 93; Schaefer-Prokop 2008

Anatomy cut off, or collimation too tight or hidden
What you see
Part of the anatomy requested is missing at the edge of the image, or the collimated edges are not visible because the image has been cropped or electronically masked.
Why it happens
Collimating to the area of interest lowers dose and improves the image, but collimating too tightly cuts off anatomy and leads to a repeat. Cropping after exposure does not reduce the area irradiated, and electronic masking can hide anatomy or poor collimation. Anatomy cut-off is one of the commonest reasons for rejected images.
Try first
  1. Check the area requested and collimate to it with the light field, allowing for the part’s full extent.
  2. Keep the physical collimation visible as a thin border; do not use electronic masking to hide anatomy or wide collimation.
  3. Check the light field matches the X-ray field (see Collimator light).
Stop and escalate when
Anatomy is cut off and the image does not answer the question: ask the radiologist whether a repeat is needed.
Explain it simply

The radiographer shapes the X-ray beam to cover only the part needed. Too narrow and part of the body is missing from the picture.

Why it matters: Getting the field right the first time avoids a second dose.

Sources: IAEA DRP 2014; ACR DR PP 2022; IAEA SSG-46; Atkinson 2020; Stephenson-Smith 2021; Hayre 2019

Wrong side marker, or no marker
What you see
The side marker is missing, on the wrong side, or added only electronically; or it hides anatomy.
Why it happens
The side shown on an image must be unambiguous. A marker placed in the beam before exposure records the side at the time; markers added afterwards can be placed wrongly, and images can be flipped.
Try first
  1. Place an anatomical side marker in the beam, inside the collimated field, before every exposure, clear of the anatomy.
  2. Check the marker on the image matches the side requested and the patient.
  3. If the marker is missing but right and left are absolutely clear from the anatomy, a repeat is not normally needed; if there is any doubt, repeat.
Stop and escalate when
An image with the wrong side has been sent: tell the radiologist straight away and correct it through your authorised process; report it as an incident.
Where sources differ
Lead versus digital markers. The SCoR (UK), the CAMRT (Canada) and the RCR audit standard expect a marker in the beam at exposure, with post-processing markers only a safety net; ASMIRT’s standards (Australia) say to verify that markers are present on each image and accurate, without specifying the type; the ACR practice parameter requires the side to be shown on every image without specifying how; a UK study found many radiographers treat digital and anatomical markers as interchangeable.
Explain it simply

A small lead letter L or R in the X-ray beam shows which side of the body is which. Adding it later on the computer is easier to get wrong.

Why it matters: A wrong-side label can lead to an operation on the wrong side.

Sources: SCoR markers 2014; CAMRT BPG; RCR XR-503; ACR DR PP 2022; Chung 2020; Hayre 2019; ASMIRT PPS 2018

Clothing, skin folds and other objects on the image Can mimic pathology
What you see
Buttons, fasteners, wires, folds of clothing, bed sheets, skin folds or positioning aids visible on the image; curved lines over the chest.
Why it happens
Anything in the beam is imaged. Clothing artefacts are a common reason for rejected images, and some positioning aids show on digital detectors.
Try first
  1. Remove clothing and objects from the area before the exposure, as your department’s gown policy describes.
  2. Smooth sheets and skin folds where you can, and check the image before the patient leaves.
  3. Tell the radiologist about an object that could not be removed.
Can mimic pathology
Skin folds, sheet folds and clothing can imitate a pneumothorax; lung markings continuing beyond the line favour a fold.
Explain it simply

X-rays show everything in their path, including buttons, zips and creases in the sheet.

Why it matters: A crease that looks like a collapsed lung could lead to an unnecessary procedure.

Sources: Stephenson-Smith 2021; Jalamneh 2023; ACR DR PP 2022

Rotation, tilt and other positioning faults
What you see
The image is rotated or tilted, for example on a PA chest the spinous processes are not midway between the medial ends of the clavicles, the scapulae overlie the lungs, or vertebral end plates are not seen as single lines.
Why it happens
Positioning is the commonest reason for rejected digital images. Quality criteria for standard projections describe what a well-positioned image shows.
Try first
  1. Check the patient’s position and the centring against your projection protocol before exposing, using the quality criteria for that view.
  2. Use positioning aids so the patient can hold the position without effort.
  3. Judge the image against the clinical question: an image that answers the question is not rejected only because a criterion is missed.
Stop and escalate when
The image cannot answer the question: ask the radiologist before repeating.
Good to know
The European quality criteria for a PA chest include full inspiration and symmetry shown by the spinous processes lying centrally between the medial ends of the clavicles. In one Australian emergency department, horizontal-beam views were among the projections with both many rejects and high reject rates: 33.5% for the hip and 30.5% for the knee (Stephenson-Smith and colleagues).
Explain it simply

If the body is turned slightly, structures overlap differently and the picture can look abnormal.

Why it matters: Correct positioning first time is the biggest single way to avoid repeat exposures.

Sources: EUR 16260 1996; Atkinson 2020; Stephenson-Smith 2021; Hofmann 2015

Equipment and system

Faults that follow the equipment rather than the patient. When equipment shows a fault, error or unusual behaviour, stop using it until it is put right, record what happened in the fault log, and report it; after repair it is tested before it is used for patients again. Steps marked as general fault-finding come from no published source: your operator manual and service engineer take precedence.

Sources: ARPANSA RPS C-5; ORS C1 2024; IAEA SSG-46; Martin 2017; ACPSEM 2024

Detector not ready, not recognised, or image not received
What you see
The DR detector will not show ready, is not recognised by the console, loses its wireless link, runs out of battery, or an exposure is made but no image appears.
Why it happens
The console must have the right detector selected and initialised before the exposure; a Bucky not pushed fully home may not initialise its detector. Wireless detectors depend on their link and battery; images can stay in the detector’s memory when transfer fails. Reported faults across manufacturers include detectors falsely showing ready, battery overheating, and an image left in a detector’s memory after a weak wireless link, which was lost when the detector was reset by removing its batteries (FDA recall Z-0704-2018).
Try first
  1. Before exposing, check the console shows the right detector as selected and ready, and the Bucky or holder is fully home.
  2. Check the battery charge and swap to a charged battery between patients, as the manufacturer describes (a general step).
  3. For a wireless detector, keep it within range of its access point and follow the manufacturer’s procedure to re-pair it (a general step).
  4. If an exposure produced no image, do not remove the battery or restart the detector until you have followed the manufacturer’s image-recovery procedure: the image may still be in the detector’s memory.
  5. Record the exposure even if no image appeared; the patient received the dose.
Stop and escalate when
The detector fails repeatedly, a battery is hot, swollen or damaged, or images are lost: take the detector or battery out of use and report it.
Explain it simply

A wireless detector is like a phone: it needs charge and a signal to send the picture. If it loses either, the picture can get stuck inside it.

Why it matters: An exposure without an image is radiation for nothing, so checking the detector is ready first matters.

Sources: AAPM TG-305; ACR DR PP 2022; AAPM TG-150 2024; FDA recalls

Tube or generator error, or tube heat warning
What you see
The console shows a tube or generator error, a heat warning or a cooling wait, an exposure stops early, or output seems to have changed.
Why it happens
The generator calculates tube loading and cooling times from the tube’s rating data; repeated high-power exposures without the required cooling can damage the anode and bearings. Tubes age, and a failing vacuum can damage the filament. Evidence of arcing is a reason to replace a tube.
Try first
  1. Note the message, the time and what was being done, and record it in the fault log.
  2. Let the tube cool if the console asks; do not try to bypass a cooling wait.
  3. Run the daily warm-up the manufacturer specifies before the first patient.
  4. Do not keep exposing patients through repeated errors.
Stop and escalate when
Errors recur, an exposure ends early or the image quality changes: stop using the unit, report it, and call service. It is checked before it is used for patients again.
Explain it simply

Making X-rays turns most of the electricity into heat. The tube needs time to cool, and an error message is a warning not to push on.

Why it matters: Respecting the warning protects the patient from failed exposures and the tube from damage.

Sources: IAEA DRP 2014; AAPM TG-150 2024; Manitoba DR QC 2019; AAPM Report 74; ARPANSA RPS C-5

Collimator light out or misaligned
What you see
The light field is dim or does not come on, has shadows from dust, or the X-ray field on the image does not match the light field (anatomy cut off on one side, or exposure outside the area set).
Why it happens
The light field shows where the X-ray beam will go. The lamp can fail or dim, and the mirror or alignment can shift, especially on mobile units, where physical knocks can cause misalignment. If they do not match, anatomy is cut off or tissue outside the area is irradiated.
Try first
  1. Check the light comes on and is bright enough; clean the collimator window as the manufacturer allows.
  2. If the light has failed, the collimator’s field-size scale can be used to set the field until it is repaired, as your local rules allow.
  3. Run your QC programme’s light and X-ray field alignment check if misalignment is suspected, and record the result.
Stop and escalate when
The fields do not match beyond your programme’s limit, or the light is out: report it to service and the physicist. IAEA HHS 47 gives both a 30-day time frame for an inoperative light and repair of inoperative or misaligned items before further patients are imaged, so your local rules decide whether the room stays in use.
Where sources differ
Alignment limits differ: ACPSEM (Australia and New Zealand, 2024) recommends within 1% of the focus-to-image distance; the US standard (21 CFR 1020.31) allows a total of 2% of SID along each axis, and IAEA HHS 47 uses 2 cm at 100 cm on any side; the EU criteria (RP 162) take equipment out of use beyond 3%.
Explain it simply

The light shows where the X-rays will go. If the light and the X-rays point at slightly different places, part of the body is missed or the wrong part gets the dose.

Why it matters: A misaligned light means repeats and dose to tissue that did not need it.

Sources: IAEA HHS 47; ACPSEM 2024; 21 CFR 1020.31; EC RP 162; AAPM TG-150 2024; AAPM Report 74; Brookfield 2015

Bucky, grid tray or wrong grid
What you see
The Bucky tray or detector will not lock or initialise, grid lines appear, signal falls off at the edges or across the image, or the wrong grid is in place.
Why it happens
A grid must suit the detector and be used within its focal distance; a tray not pushed fully home may not initialise the detector; a mispositioned detent or a tilted or damaged grid causes cut-off; a moving grid that stops leaves visible lines.
Try first
  1. Push the tray or detector fully home and check the console shows it ready.
  2. Check the grid fitted is the one for that receptor and SID, and is the right way up.
  3. Look for grid lines or uneven signal on the image (see Grid lines and Grid cut-off).
Stop and escalate when
Grid lines from a moving grid, cut-off at the correct set-up, or a damaged grid: take the Bucky or grid out of use and report it.
Explain it simply

The grid sits in a tray in front of the detector. If the tray is not fully in, or the grid is the wrong one, the picture suffers.

Why it matters: Grid faults cause repeats, and a stuck grid affects every patient in that room.

Sources: AAPM TG-150 2024; AAPM TG-305; IAEA DRP 2014; EC RP 162

AEC gives the wrong exposure or stops on the backup timer
What you see
AEC images are noisy or the DI is far off target, the exposure ends on the backup timer with a warning, or exposures differ for similar patients.
Why it happens
The AEC measures the radiation through the selected chambers. It gives the wrong exposure if the anatomy is not centred over the active chambers, the wrong chambers are selected, a dense object such as a hip prosthesis or a shield covers a chamber, or a small child’s anatomy only partly covers it. If the AEC does not end the exposure, the backup timer stops it.
Try first
  1. Check the selected chambers match the protocol for the view and are covered by the anatomy.
  2. If metal or a shield will lie over a chamber, use a size-based manual technique instead.
  3. After a backup-timer stop, the system needs resetting; check the set-up before exposing again, and do not repeat at the same settings without finding the cause.
  4. Never let a shield cover an active AEC chamber.
Stop and escalate when
The AEC ends on the backup timer with a correct set-up, or exposures are inconsistent: stop using AEC on that unit until it is checked, and report it.
Explain it simply

The automatic exposure control measures the X-rays as they arrive and switches off when there are enough. If its sensors are covered by the wrong thing, it gets it wrong.

Why it matters: A faulty AEC can overexpose many patients before anyone notices.

Sources: ACR DR PP 2022; AAPM TG-150 2024; 21 CFR 1020.31; IAEA HHS 47; ACPSEM 2024; NCRP 13; Chen 2026

Mobile unit will not drive, brake or charge
What you see
A mobile X-ray unit will not drive, drives erratically or moves on its own, does not stop when the drive handle is released, will not charge, or its arm or column is loose.
Why it happens
Manufacturers have recalled mobile units for brakes that did not apply when the handle was released, uncommanded movement (including from static discharge and from cleaning liquid shorting a button), wheel shafts breaking when driven over high thresholds, loose tube-arm bolts, and battery fire risk while charging.
Try first
  1. Releasing the drive handle should stop the unit; if it does not, use the emergency stop and keep people clear (a general step; know where your unit’s emergency stop is).
  2. Drive slowly over thresholds and into lifts, and keep feet and other people clear.
  3. Clean the unit as the manufacturer instructs, without spraying liquid directly onto it.
  4. Charge the unit where your department specifies and report a battery that is hot or damaged.
Stop and escalate when
Any uncommanded movement, brake failure, loose arm or charging fault: take the unit out of use, label it, and report it to service and through your incident system.
Explain it simply

A mobile X-ray unit is a heavy motorised machine. If its drive or brakes fail, it can hit people or walls.

Why it matters: Staff and patients have been injured by mobile units that moved unexpectedly.

Sources: FDA recalls; BfArM 2013; FDA MAUDE; ACPSEM 2024

Dose-area product reading missing or odd
What you see
The dose-area product (DAP or KAP) is not displayed, is zero, differs between the console and PACS, or is far from usual for the examination.
Why it happens
The DAP meter measures the radiation leaving the collimator and is recorded with the image (in the DICOM header and dose report). A missing or mismatched value can come from a meter fault or a set-up fault in how dose data are passed on.
Try first
  1. Check the examination and technique were as usual, and that the reading is not explained by a larger field or repeat.
  2. Record the technique factors so dose can be estimated if needed.
  3. Report a missing or mismatched value so the meter and data transfer can be checked.
Stop and escalate when
The meter is faulty: report it. IAEA HHS 47 says the unit may be used until the meter is repaired if everything else performs, so long as your local rules allow it.
Explain it simply

A small meter on the tube measures how much radiation went out. If it stops working, the patient’s dose cannot be recorded properly.

Why it matters: Dose records are how departments find overexposures and check their protocols.

Sources: IAEA HHS 47; AAPM TG-150 2024; ACPSEM 2024; IAEA DRP 2014

Images not on PACS, image lost, or worklist wrong
What you see
Images do not reach PACS, are missing after transfer, an image is lost after the system froze, or the worklist does not show the patient or shows wrong entries.
Why it happens
The modality sends images to PACS and, with storage commitment, deletes its copies only after PACS confirms storage. Links between a wireless detector and its console often lack that confirmation, so departments need a recovery strategy. Patient details come from the modality worklist; manual entry is error-prone.
Try first
  1. Check the send queue and the destination, and resend failed images; compare image counts.
  2. Do not delete images from the console until PACS has confirmed storage.
  3. If an image appears lost, check the detector and console before re-exposing (see Detector problems).
  4. If the worklist is empty or wrong, check the booking, and enter details by hand only under your downtime procedure.
  5. Keep rejected images retrievable for reject analysis; do not delete them directly from PACS.
Stop and escalate when
Images are still missing, or a patient identity error is found: contact your PACS or IT team and report it through your incident process.
Explain it simply

The X-ray system posts pictures to the hospital’s picture library and waits for a receipt before deleting its own copy.

Why it matters: A lost image can mean repeating an exposure; a mislabelled one can mean the wrong person’s result.

Sources: DICOM PS3.4; Clunie 2014; ACR DR PP 2022; AAPM TG-150 2024; AAPM TG-305; Martin 2017; FDA recalls

QC check failed or detector calibration due
What you see
A routine QC test fails (uniformity, artefacts, exposure index constancy, light field), the system asks for detector calibration, or the reject rate is unusually high or low.
Why it happens
QC catches drift in the tube, AEC, detector and DAP meter before it affects patients. Detector calibration is done as the manufacturer specifies; on some systems it is a radiographer task, on others a service task. Excess non-uniformity or lines can mean recalibration is needed.
Try first
  1. Repeat the test with the set-up checked (the same phantom, distance, detector and settings).
  2. Run the detector calibration if it is a user task on your system, as the manufacturer specifies, with nothing left in the beam.
  3. Record results and actions in the QC log.
  4. Review rejected images with their reasons, not only the overall rate.
Stop and escalate when
The test still fails: tell the medical physicist, who decides with service whether the equipment stays in use.
Where sources differ
Reject-rate targets. AAPM TG-151 (via TG-305) suggests 8% for adults with investigation below 5% or above 10%; ACPSEM (Australia and New Zealand) considers 8 ± 2% appropriate for a typical service and 5 ± 2% for paediatric radiography; IAEA HHS 47 reports 4% to 8% and says to set targets locally. TG-305 counts per exposure, ACPSEM per image. A very low rate can mean rejects are not being recorded.
Explain it simply

Regular test pictures of a plastic block show whether the machine still behaves the same. A change is the early warning.

Why it matters: QC finds problems before they reach patients’ images.

Sources: ACPSEM 2024; IAEA HHS 47; AAPM TG-150 2024; AAPM TG-305; ACR-AAPM Radiographic TS 2026; Manitoba DR QC 2019; ACR DR PP 2022

Patient and workflow

Most of these problems are solved before the exposure: identify the patient, explain what will happen, choose the positioning and immobilisation that suit them, and keep everyone else out of the beam. Mobile radiography is used only when moving the patient to the department is impractical or not medically acceptable.

Sources: IAEA SSG-46; CAMRT BPG; Health Canada SC35

Checking it is the right patient and the right side
What you see
Before exposing, the identity of the patient or the side to be imaged needs confirming: a patient who cannot answer, a common name, a ward patient, or a request that does not match what the patient says.
Why it happens
Wrong-patient and wrong-side exposures are always possible. At least two, preferably three, identifiers checked against the request, open questions, and the side confirmed with the patient prevent most of them. Images must show the patient’s identity and the side imaged.
Try first
  1. Ask the patient to state their full name and date of birth (open questions) and what they are having done, including the side; match the answers to the request and identity band. A room or bed number is not an identifier.
  2. For a patient who cannot answer, use the identity band, the health record or the staff caring for them, as your policy describes.
  3. Select the right patient, examination and projection on the console (for example AP or PA), since this sets the image labels.
  4. Place a side marker in the beam (see Wrong or missing marker) and check details and side on the image before release.
Stop and escalate when
Any mismatch: do not expose until it is resolved, and report it through your incident process.
Explain it simply

Before an X-ray, staff check who you are and which side is being imaged, like checking an address before delivering a parcel.

Why it matters: Imaging the wrong person or side gives radiation for nothing and can lead to the wrong treatment.

Sources: IAEA SSG-46; CAMRT BPG; ORS C1 2024; ACR DR PP 2022; ASMIRT PPS 2018; Chung 2020

Pregnancy uncertain or confirmed
What you see
A patient of childbearing potential is booked for an examination that includes the abdomen or pelvis, and might be pregnant, is not sure, or the answer is unclear; or a pregnant patient is booked.
Why it happens
Pregnancy status is checked before exposures where the primary beam may irradiate the pelvis. Most plain radiographs give the embryo or fetus a very small dose: chest, extremity and head radiographs give it only scattered radiation, except that a chest radiograph late in pregnancy can include part of the fetus in the beam (the ACR-SPR parameter suggests a frontal view only), and the ACR-SPR parameter says most radiographic examinations deliver much less than 20 mGy to a conceptus.
Try first
  1. Ask every patient of childbearing potential, privately, using your department’s questions or form, immediately before the examination, and record the answer.
  2. If pregnancy cannot be excluded for an examination of the abdomen or pelvis, follow your local procedure: the radiologist or practitioner decides whether to proceed, delay or change the examination.
  3. For a pregnant patient whose examination is justified, collimate tightly to the area needed; prone positioning for pelvic examinations reduces fetal dose where possible (Health Canada). The CAMRT page on pregnant patients, which is under review, also advises PA rather than AP positioning where possible.
  4. Lead shielding of the abdomen for examinations of other regions is not required by current UK and US guidance; a drape may be offered for reassurance if your written procedure allows it (see Shielding requests).
Stop and escalate when
The patient is or may be pregnant and the abdomen or pelvis is in the beam: the practitioner or radiologist decides before the exposure.
Where sources differ
When to ask differs by region. UK (HPA 2009, RCR 2026): ask when the primary beam may irradiate the pelvis, between the diaphragm and the knees; for low-dose examinations (below about 10 mGy fetal dose, which covers plain radiographs) proceed if the period is not overdue. US (ACR-SPR 2023): chest, extremity, head and neck radiography generally need no verification. Australia (ARPANSA RPS C-5): establish status before procedures likely to give 1 mSv or more to the uterus. New Zealand (ORS C1): before any procedure that could give a significant fetal dose. Canada (CAMRT): ask all female patients of childbearing age, for example 10 to 55.
Explain it simply

An unborn baby is more sensitive to radiation, so staff ask about pregnancy before X-raying the tummy. Most X-rays give the baby very little radiation.

Why it matters: Asking every time, immediately before the X-ray, reduces unplanned exposures of an unborn baby.

Sources: HPA RCE-9 2009; ACR-SPR Pregnancy PP; RCR IR(ME)R 2026; ARPANSA RPS C-5; ORS C1 2024; CAMRT BPG; Health Canada SC35; BIR shielding 2020

Patient or parent asks for a lead shield
What you see
A patient, parent or carer asks for a lead shield, or you are unsure whether your department still uses gonad or fetal shielding.
Why it happens
Diagnostic doses have not been linked to measurable harm to the gonads or fetus, shields do not stop scatter inside the body, and shields can hide anatomy, cause repeats, and raise the exposure if they cover an AEC chamber (AAPM, NCRP). Regional guidance now differs on routine shielding (below).
Try first
  1. Follow your local shielding policy, which reflects your regional rules.
  2. Where your policy does not shield routinely and a patient asks for a shield, explain that careful collimation and technique protect them more; a shield may then be offered after discussion where it will not interfere with the examination.
  3. Never let a shield cover the anatomy of interest or an active AEC chamber.
Stop and escalate when
The patient will not proceed without a shield that would compromise the examination: ask the radiologist or practitioner.
Where sources differ
AAPM (2019) and NCRP (2021): routine gonad and fetal shielding should stop. UK (BIR and others, 2020): routine shielding is not recommended, with narrow exceptions set out in its tables; shielding more than about 5 cm from the beam has a negligible effect. Health Canada (2024): patient shielding is “not recommended unless there are clear benefits”, and routine gonadal shielding should not be used. Australia: ARPANSA’s safety guide RPS 14.1 (2008), which ARPANSA says can still be used alongside its 2019 code, says to shield the gonads, eyes, breast and thyroid whenever feasible, unless the shield would obscure the anatomy needed. New Zealand: ORS C1 does not address patient shielding. ASMIRT’s standards say to use shielding devices “when appropriate”. Follow your local and regional rules.
Explain it simply

Lead shields can slip into the picture and make the machine use more radiation, so many countries no longer use them routinely; careful aiming of the beam protects more.

Why it matters: Removing routine shields avoids repeats and hidden findings, while respecting patients who still want one.

Sources: AAPM PS 8-A; NCRP 13; BIR shielding 2020; Health Canada SC35; ARPANSA RPS 14.1; ARPANSA RPS C-5; ORS C1 2024; ASMIRT PPS 2018; IAEA RPOP children; ACR DR PP 2022

Children and immobilisation
What you see
A baby or young child needs an X-ray, will not keep still, or the protocol is designed for adults.
Why it happens
Children are more sensitive to radiation and vary widely in size, so technique is matched to their size. Movement is the main challenge. Grids are not normally needed for small children.
Try first
  1. Measure the part thickness and use the child-size technique your protocol sets.
  2. Avoid a grid for body parts thinner than about 10 to 12 cm (Image Gently); grids are normally needed only for teenagers and larger children.
  3. With AEC, make sure the sensors are inside the field and covered by the anatomy; small anatomy can cut the exposure short. The IAEA notes that AEC is often unsuitable for small children, and exposure charts based on thickness are an alternative.
  4. Use immobilisation devices first; explain in words the child understands, and involve the parent (see Holding).
  5. Collimate to the area needed; image only the projections the radiologist needs.
Stop and escalate when
The child cannot be kept still with these measures: agree a plan with the radiologist and referrer.
Explain it simply

Children are smaller and more sensitive to radiation, so their X-rays use less of it. Keeping a small child still for a moment is the main challenge.

Why it matters: A child-sized X-ray done right the first time gives the lowest dose.

Sources: Image Gently DR; IAEA RPOP children; IAEA SSG-46; ACR DR PP 2022; Health Canada SC35; Don 2013

Someone needs to hold the patient
What you see
A child or a patient who cannot keep still needs holding during the exposure, and someone (a parent, an escort or a member of staff) offers to hold.
Why it happens
Immobilisation devices are used first. Staff should not hold patients. A person who holds acts as a carer or comforter: they are informed about the risk, agree, are not pregnant, stay out of the direct beam and wear a protective apron. Their dose is limited by a constraint set under local or national rules.
Try first
  1. Try immobilisation devices first.
  2. If holding is needed, ask a relative or friend who agrees after being told the risks; check they are not pregnant and are an adult where possible.
  3. Give them a protective apron (and gloves if their hands are near the beam), position them out of the direct beam, and collimate tightly.
  4. Never hold the detector or cassette by hand during the exposure.
Stop and escalate when
No suitable carer and the patient cannot be immobilised: ask the radiologist or practitioner how to proceed.
Where sources differ
Dose constraints differ: IAEA SSG-46 says 5 mSv per episode is commonly used for adult carers and 1 mSv per episode for a child carer; the Australian code (ARPANSA RPS C-5) uses 1 mSv per diagnostic examination; UK and New Zealand rules leave the constraint to the employer or licence holder. Who may hold: the IAEA, ARPANSA and New Zealand steer away from staff holding; Health Canada allows parents, escorts or other personnel to assist occasionally, with aprons and gloves, but no one should do it regularly; a CAMRT page (2012) allows another healthcare professional. Pregnant carers: the IAEA says carers should not be pregnant and, where one is, the fetal dose is often constrained to 1 mSv per episode; the RCR says a pregnant carer would not normally be designated, but may be with medical physics advice if informed and willing.
Explain it simply

If someone has to hold a child still, they are told about the small risk, wear a lead apron and keep out of the beam. Staff and pregnant people should not do it.

Why it matters: Clear rules keep the holder’s dose tiny and avoid staff building up doses over time.

Sources: IAEA SSG-46; Health Canada SC35; ORS C1 2024; IR(ME)R 2017; RCR IR(ME)R 2026; ARPANSA RPS C-5; ARPANSA RPS 14.1; CAMRT BPG

Ward, ICU and theatre mobiles: people nearby, lines and tubes
What you see
You are taking a mobile X-ray on a ward, in ICU, in the emergency department or in theatre, with other patients, staff and visitors nearby, and the patient has lines, tubes or drains.
Why it happens
The area around a mobile becomes a controlled area during the exposure. Other people are protected mainly by distance, by directing the beam away from them and by aprons for those who must stay. Mobile images are usually of lower quality than department images, and the radiographer is responsible for radiation safety during the exposure.
Try first
  1. Ask everyone not needed to move away before the exposure, give a clear warning such as “X-ray”, and wait until they have gone. The IAEA advises asking pregnant staff (other than radiology staff) to leave the vicinity in trauma rooms; apply it to wards as your local rules say.
  2. Direct the beam away from other people, even if that means repositioning the patient.
  3. Anyone who must stay close (for example with a ventilated patient) wears a protective apron; you wear one too and stand as far away as possible while keeping the patient in view.
  4. Before moving the patient or sliding the detector, check lines, tubes and drains with the nursing staff and use transfer aids and enough help.
  5. Collimate within the detector and check the image before leaving.
Stop and escalate when
You cannot control the area or keep people out of the beam: do not expose until you can.
Where sources differ
Distance. IAEA SSG-46 says other staff typically at least 3 m from the patient or behind a barrier; Health Canada says the operator at least 3 m from the tube unless wearing protection; ARPANSA’s safety guide RPS 14.1 (2008), still used alongside its 2019 code, says the operator stands at least 2 m from the tube and outside the primary beam, wearing an apron; UK and New Zealand rules give no distance and leave it to local rules. Follow your local rules.
Explain it simply

A mobile X-ray on a ward is like a small, temporary X-ray room. The radiographer clears space around the bed and points the beam away from other people.

Why it matters: Good mobile practice keeps the dose to neighbours and staff very small.

Sources: IAEA SSG-46; HSE L121; CAMRT BPG; Health Canada SC35; ARPANSA RPS 14.1; Brady 2020; Schaefer-Prokop 2008; ARPANSA RPS C-5

Infection control on mobiles and detectors
What you see
The patient is in isolation or on contact, droplet or airborne precautions, or a detector and mobile unit move between patients.
Why it happens
Detectors and mobile units touch many patients and can carry infection between them. Routine practices apply to every patient, with extra precautions for patients in isolation.
Try first
  1. Follow your facility’s infection control procedures: hand hygiene, and the gloves, gown, mask and eye protection the precautions require.
  2. Decontaminate the detector, cassettes and positioning aids after each patient following the manufacturer’s instructions, or cover them with a single-use cover (SoR).
  3. Isolate electrical equipment from the mains before cleaning it (SoR), and do not spray liquid directly onto a mobile unit: excess liquid has caused a unit to move on its own.
  4. Where your procedure uses detector bags, remove the outer layer without contaminating the inner one.
Good to know
The only professional-body guidance found is the SoR’s 2006 guidance on health care associated infections, now in its archive, written for cassettes before DR detectors were common, and not covering isolation-room technique; one hospital’s published pandemic technique (Brady 2020) describes bagging detectors. Your local infection control policy takes precedence.
Explain it simply

The detector touches lots of patients, so it is cleaned or covered every time, like a shared thermometer.

Why it matters: Clean equipment stops the X-ray service spreading infection around the hospital.

Sources: CAMRT BPG; SoR HCAI 2006; Brady 2020; FDA recalls

Patient cannot stand or hold the position
What you see
The patient cannot stand for an erect view, cannot keep a position, or is too unwell or in too much pain to move.
Why it happens
Holding a position takes effort, and pain, weakness and confusion cause movement. Positioning aids and adapted technique let the patient keep still without effort.
Try first
  1. Adapt the projection to the patient’s condition (for example seated or supine instead of erect) as your protocol allows, and tell the radiologist which projection was taken.
  2. Use positioning and immobilisation aids (pads, sandbags, straps) so the patient does not have to work to keep still.
  3. Use transfer aids and enough staff to move the patient; do not lift alone (see Fall).
  4. Give the instruction and expose quickly, with the shortest exposure time your technique allows.
Stop and escalate when
The patient deteriorates, faints or cannot be positioned at all: stop, get help, and ask the radiologist what is still needed.
Explain it simply

If someone cannot stand, the X-ray is taken sitting or lying instead, with pads to help them keep still.

Why it matters: Adapting the X-ray to the patient gets a useful picture without making them more unwell.

Sources: ASMIRT PPS 2018; Health Canada SC35; IAEA SSG-46; CAMRT BPG

Trauma and spinal immobilisation
What you see
A trauma patient arrives immobilised, possibly with a spinal injury, in the emergency department or resuscitation room.
Why it happens
In suspected spinal injury, protection of the spine and the choice of imaging follow the trauma guideline. In England, NICE recommends CT for the adult cervical spine when imaging is indicated, and plain X-ray as the first-line test for thoracic or lumbosacral injury without neurological signs.
Try first
  1. Keep the immobilisation in place and move the patient only as the trauma team directs, with in-line stabilisation.
  2. Confirm the imaging requested matches your trauma protocol.
  3. In a shared trauma room: direct the beam away from staff and other patients, ask staff who must stay to wear aprons, ask pregnant staff (other than radiology staff) to leave the vicinity (IAEA), and give a warning before the exposure.
  4. For children, NICE allows the peg view to be omitted when the child cannot follow commands or open their mouth.
Stop and escalate when
X-rays are technically inadequate and injury is still suspected: tell the radiologist; CT may be needed.
Good to know
No guideline was found that sets out horizontal-beam or cross-table technique for immobilised patients; follow your local protocol.
Explain it simply

After an accident, the neck and back are kept still in case they are injured. The X-ray team works around the collar and boards.

Why it matters: Moving an injured spine the wrong way can cause permanent damage.

Sources: NICE NG41; NICE NG232; IAEA SSG-46

Large patient
What you see
The patient is large: near the table or stand limit, wider than the detector, or images are noisy or need multiple exposures.
Why it happens
Weight and girth matter more than body mass index. Larger patients attenuate more, so images are noisier and exposure times longer, and the anatomy may be bigger than one detector.
Try first
  1. Record weight and girth, and check them against your equipment’s limits; exceeding a manufacturer’s weight limit can damage the equipment.
  2. Plan overlapping images when the anatomy is larger than the detector.
  3. Position the patient so the thinnest layer of tissue is next to the detector, and raise the kV as your protocol allows; these reduce dose.
  4. Use landmarks you can find through tissue, and check the image for noise and motion.
Stop and escalate when
The patient exceeds the equipment’s limits: do not proceed on that equipment; ask the radiologist or referrer about alternatives.
Explain it simply

In a larger body, fewer X-rays get through, so the settings and positioning are adapted to get a clear picture at the lowest dose.

Why it matters: Planning ahead avoids repeats, which add more dose in larger patients.

Sources: Uppot 2018; Yanch 2009; Modica 2011

Language, hearing or other communication barriers
What you see
The patient does not share your language, is Deaf or hard of hearing, or cannot understand or respond to breathing and positioning instructions.
Why it happens
Identification, pregnancy questions, positioning and breathing instructions all depend on two-way communication; instructions should be clear and in a language the patient understands.
Try first
  1. Arrange a qualified interpreter, in person or by a remote service.
  2. Agree simple signals and demonstrate the position and the breathing instruction before the exposure.
  3. Keep the patient in view and within talking distance, and explain they can stop at any time.
Stop and escalate when
Identification, consent or the pregnancy question cannot be completed reliably: ask the radiologist or practitioner before exposing.
Explain it simply

An X-ray needs the patient to hold still and breathe on cue, so everyone needs a way to understand the instructions.

Why it matters: Clear communication gets the picture right first time.

Sources: IAEA SSG-46; CAMRT BPG; HDC Code 1996

Safety incidents

These cards are reminders of what the guidelines say. In a real incident, follow your department’s emergency and incident procedures, your radiologist and medical physicist, and your regional rules, which take precedence over this page. Fluoroscopy and C-arm incidents will be covered on their own page.

Sources: IAEA SSG-46; Martin 2017

Wrong patient, wrong side or wrong region exposed
What you see
You find that the person X-rayed was not the patient on the request, the wrong side, region or examination was imaged, or images were stored under the wrong patient.
Do this now
  1. Stop, check on both patients and confirm who each one is, and tell the radiologist or practitioner now.
  2. Keep the images and dose record; do not delete anything. Write down what happened and when.
  3. Report it through your incident system as your local procedure directs. A medical physicist estimates the dose received.
  4. The referrer and the patient (or their representative) are told what happened, under your open disclosure or duty of candour policy.
  5. Correct the records through your authorised correction process.
  6. Whether the regulator must be notified depends on your country’s criteria; your employer decides after the preliminary investigation. Do not guess thresholds yourself.
Where sources differ
The frameworks agree on investigating, estimating the dose and informing the referrer and patient; the detail differs. UK (IR(ME)R 2017 regulation 8, CQC guidance): the employer investigates and notifies the enforcing authority of exposures significantly greater than intended, with criteria that differ between England and the other nations; the duty to tell the patient covers clinically significant exposures (not defined in the regulations; RCR guidance helps employers decide), alongside the duty of candour. New Zealand (ORS C1): the licence holder notifies the Director of an overexposure as soon as practicable, investigates with dose estimates, and makes sure the referrer and patient are told of any unintended medical exposure; the HDC expects open disclosure usually within 24 hours. Australia (ARPANSA RPS C-5): the operator reports to the Responsible Person and the radiologist, a medical physicist estimates the dose, the radiologist informs the patient, and reports go to the state or territory regulator as it requires. IAEA SSG-46: investigation with a physicist’s dose estimate, the referrer notified, significant events reported to the regulator.
Explain it simply

If the wrong person or the wrong part is X-rayed, staff stop, look after both patients, work out the dose, and tell them openly.

Why it matters: Honest reporting finds the gap in the checks so it does not happen to the next patient.

Sources: IAEA SSG-46; IR(ME)R 2017; CQC SAUE 2024; RCR IR(ME)R 2026; ORS C1 2024; HDC Open Disclosure 2019; ARPANSA RPS C-5; Clunie 2014

Unplanned repeat or a higher exposure than intended
What you see
An image needs repeating, or more radiation was given than planned: wrong technique or protocol (such as an adult setting on a child), the wrong detector selected, an exposure with no image, a CR plate exposed twice, or an equipment fault.
Do this now
  1. Before repeating, check the image really cannot answer the question (zoom, reprocess) and ask the radiologist if unsure.
  2. Find and correct the cause first: technique, detector selection, positioning, collimation or equipment.
  3. Record the repeat and its reason so it appears in reject analysis.
  4. Equipment fault: stop using the equipment until it is put right, record it and report it (see Equipment and system).
  5. Report wrong settings and exposures much greater than intended through your incident process; a medical physicist estimates the dose and your employer decides on notification.
Good to know
In the UK, a technical repeat with no procedural, human, systematic or equipment error (for example images spoiled by movement) is not a statutory notification, but events and near misses are still recorded and analysed locally (CQC). An exposure made on a detector that was not selected, or without generating an image, still counts as an exposure.
Explain it simply

Every repeat is more radiation. A repeat is fine when it is needed, but the reason is fixed first and written down.

Why it matters: Recording repeats shows patterns, such as a room or protocol that keeps causing them.

Sources: CQC SAUE 2024; IR(ME)R 2017; ARPANSA RPS C-5; ORS C1 2024; IAEA SSG-46; AAPM TG-305; Martin 2017

Pregnant patient found to have been exposed
What you see
After an X-ray, it emerges that the patient was pregnant at the time.
Do this now
  1. Tell the radiologist or practitioner and report it through your incident process: an inadvertent exposure of an embryo or fetus is investigated.
  2. A medical physicist estimates the dose to the embryo or fetus; it needs the examination details and the stage of pregnancy.
  3. The referrer and the patient are informed, and counselling is given by a clinician with the right experience, using the estimate.
  4. Record how pregnancy status was checked before the exposure.
  5. Your regional rules decide whether the regulator must be told.
Good to know
For the counselling clinician, not for the radiographer to give: the HPA table puts chest, skull and thoracic spine radiographs at 0.001 to 0.01 mGy to the fetus, abdomen, pelvis and hip at 0.1 to 1.0 mGy, and lumbar spine at 1.0 to 10 mGy; the ACR-SPR parameter says most radiographic examinations deliver much less than 20 mGy to a conceptus.
Explain it simply

If someone turns out to have been pregnant during an X-ray, an expert works out how much radiation reached the baby, and a doctor explains what that means. For most X-rays it is very little.

Why it matters: A careful, honest explanation prevents needless distress.

Sources: IAEA SSG-46; HPA RCE-9 2009; ACR-SPR Pregnancy PP; CAMRT BPG; ARPANSA RPS C-5; ORS C1 2024; IR(ME)R 2017

Staff exposure or a dosimeter concern
What you see
A dosimeter is lost, damaged, left in the X-ray room or exposed when not worn, a dose report is higher than usual, or a member of staff thinks they were in the beam.
Why it happens
Dosimeters estimate each worker’s dose, and investigation levels give early warning that working practice needs review. A dosimeter is worn only by the person it was issued to, in the position your provider specifies, and stored away from radiation when not worn.
Do this now
  1. Lost or damaged dosimeter: tell your radiation protection officer or supervisor straight away; the dose for that period is estimated and recorded.
  2. Dosimeter left in the room or exposed when not worn: tell the radiation protection officer, so the reading is not wrongly recorded as your dose.
  3. A higher than usual reading, or a possible exposure in the beam: tell the radiation protection officer; the investigation looks at your work routine, incidents and colleagues’ doses.
  4. Pregnant staff: tell your employer so duties can be reviewed under your local rules.
Where sources differ
Where to wear it with an apron: IAEA SSG-46 says under the apron if you only sometimes wear one, and outside at the collar only if you always wear one, unless national rules say otherwise; Health Canada says under the apron. Follow your dosimetry provider. Investigation levels differ: the UK caps the investigation level at 15 mSv a year and employers usually set it much lower (the UK annual dose limit for adult employees is 20 mSv); IAEA SSG-46 gives examples such as more than 0.5 mSv a month under an apron; New Zealand leaves levels to the licence holder, and Australia to the Responsible Person.
Explain it simply

The badge records how much radiation you have been exposed to. If it is lost or gets X-rayed on its own, your record could be wrong, so you tell the safety officer.

Why it matters: Accurate records protect staff and show whether working practices need to change.

Sources: IAEA SSG-46; HSE L121; ORS C1 2024; ARPANSA RPS C-1; Health Canada SC35; NZ RSA 2016

Detector, tube or stand strikes a patient
What you see
A detector is dropped onto a patient, a wall stand or tube moves onto a patient, or a patient is caught by moving equipment.
Why it happens
Such events have been reported to the US FDA, including a detector falling on a patient’s eye, wall stands moving down onto patients’ legs, automatic tube movement towards a seated patient, and portable detectors dropped from tables. Detectors are handled close to patients; one technologist reported a wrist fracture after repeatedly lifting a detector one-handed.
Do this now
  1. Stop all movement (use the emergency stop if needed), check the patient for injury and get medical help.
  2. Do not move the equipment unless it is still a danger; record what happened, including any error messages.
  3. Take the equipment out of use and report it to service and through your incident system.
  4. Know where the emergency stops are and how your system’s automatic movements work before using it.
Good to know
These events come from US adverse event reports, which cannot show how often they happen. Hold detectors with two hands and use the holders provided (a general step).
Explain it simply

Detectors and X-ray tubes are heavy and some move by motor. If one falls or moves the wrong way, it can hurt the patient.

Why it matters: Knowing where the emergency stop is lets you stop moving equipment in a second.

Sources: FDA MAUDE; FDA recalls; Walz-Flannigan 2018

Mobile unit collision or uncommanded movement
What you see
A mobile X-ray unit hits a person, wall or door, moves on its own, or does not stop.
Why it happens
Staff have been injured by motorised mobile units: feet run over, people pinned against walls, and fingers caught in the tube arm. Manufacturers have recalled units for brakes that did not apply and for uncommanded movement.
Do this now
  1. Release the drive handle and press the emergency stop; keep people clear.
  2. Check the person struck and get first aid or medical help.
  3. Take the unit out of use, label it, and report it to service and through your incident system.
  4. Drive slowly, look where you are going, and do not hold a door with one hand while driving with the other (a general step).
Explain it simply

A mobile X-ray unit is a heavy motorised machine. If it moves the wrong way, it can hurt people.

Why it matters: Reporting every collision or odd movement lets faulty units be fixed before someone is badly hurt.

Sources: FDA MAUDE; FDA recalls; BfArM 2013

Fall during radiography or a transfer
What you see
A patient falls, slips or is lowered to the floor while getting on or off the table, standing at the erect stand, during a transfer, or while walking in the department.
Why it happens
Falls happen in imaging departments, and most patients who fall have at least one risk factor; some are injured. Radiography rooms are among the commonest places for them.
Do this now
  1. Call for help, stay with the patient and check whether they are hurt; get a doctor to assess them (a general step; follow your falls procedure).
  2. Do not lift the patient alone: use the handling aids and the number of staff your assessment calls for.
  3. Record the fall and report it through your incident process, and follow up as your policy requires.
  4. Before the next transfer, reassess fall risk: it can change during the examination.
Good to know
Prevention: assess each patient’s fall risk under your policy, help patients onto and off the table and stand, keep the call button within reach, and use slide sheets, slide boards or lifts as needed.
Explain it simply

Getting onto a narrow table or standing still at the stand can be hard, especially for older or unwell people. A fall can cause a serious injury.

Why it matters: A quick risk check and the right help reduce falls.

Sources: CAMRT BPG; Abujudeh 2011

Cardiac or respiratory arrest in the department
What you see
The patient is unresponsive and not breathing normally, or only gasping.
Do this now
  1. Call the resuscitation team on your emergency number and stop any exposure.
  2. Start chest compressions at once: CPR is started for anyone unresponsive and not breathing normally, even with occasional gasps. Staff trained and willing to give rescue breaths do so.
  3. Attach a defibrillator or AED as soon as it arrives and follow its prompts. Minimise pauses in compressions.
  4. Move equipment, including a mobile unit, out of the team’s way.
  5. Afterwards, record the times and events and report the incident.
Explain it simply

If the heart or breathing stops, pressing hard and fast on the chest keeps blood moving to the brain until the team and a defibrillator arrive.

Why it matters: Every minute without compressions lowers the chance of survival, so they start straight away.

Sources: ANZCOR Guideline 8 2021; FDA MAUDE

Sources

Guidance is cited in its current editions. Radiation rules differ by country; each card names the frameworks it draws on. Sources were checked on 14 October 2026.

  1. 21 CFR 1020.31 Radiographic equipment (US FDA performance standard for diagnostic X-ray equipment). eCFR version current at 1 Oct 2026; last amendment dated 30 Dec 2016. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-J/part-1020/section-1020.31
  2. Abujudeh H, Kaewlai R, Shah B, Thrall J. Characteristics of falls in a large academic radiology department: occurrence, associated factors, outcomes, and quality improvement strategies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197(1):154-159. doi:10.2214/AJR.10.4994
  3. ACR–SPR Practice Parameter for Imaging Pregnant or Potentially Pregnant Patients with Ionizing Radiation. Revised 2023 (Resolution 31). Reston, VA: ACR. https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/DownloadPreviewDocument?DocId=23
  4. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. AAPM Position Statement on the Use of Patient Gonadal and Fetal Shielding. Policy PS 8-A (originally PP 32-A), approved 2 April 2019 (Board of Directors meeting minutes, April 2-3, 2019); PS 8-A sunset date 31 December 2030 (PP 32-A, same text, marked inactive with sunset 31 Dec 2024). https://www.aapm.org/org/policies/details.asp?id=2552&type=PS
  5. American College of Radiology, American Association of Physicists in Medicine, Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine, Society for Pediatric Radiology. ACR-AAPM-SIIM-SPR Practice Parameter for Digital Radiography. Revised 2022 (Resolution 47); amended 2023 (Resolution 2c, 2d). Reston, VA: ACR. https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/DownloadPreviewDocument?DocId=135
  6. American College of Radiology; American Association of Physicists in Medicine. ACR–AAPM Technical Standard for Diagnostic Medical Physics Performance Monitoring of Radiographic Equipment. Revised 2026 (CSC/BOC). (Chronology: 1992; revised 1997, 2001, 2006, 2011, 2021; amended 2022, 2023; revised 2026.) https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/DownloadPreviewDocument?DocId=120
  7. ARPANSA. Code for Radiation Protection in Medical Exposure. Radiation Protection Series C-5 (RPS C-5). Yallambie: ARPANSA; July 2019. https://www.arpansa.gov.au/regulation-and-licensing/regulatory-publications/radiation-protection-series/codes-and-standards/rpsc-5
  8. Atkinson S, Neep M, Starkey D. Reject rate analysis in digital radiography: an Australian emergency imaging department case study. J Med Radiat Sci. 2020;67(1):72-79. doi:10.1002/jmrs.343. PMID 31318181; PMCID PMC7063252. Open access CC BY. Verified PubMed.
  9. Australian and New Zealand Committee on Resuscitation. Guideline 8: Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR). Approved April 2021. https://www.anzcor.org/home/basic-life-support/guideline-8-cardiopulmonary-resuscitation-cpr
  10. Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency. Code for Radiation Protection in Planned Exposure Situations. Radiation Protection Series C-1 (Rev. 1). ARPANSA; January 2020 (supersedes the 2016 edition). https://www.arpansa.gov.au/sites/default/files/20200404-rps_c-1_rev_1.docx
  11. Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency. Safety Guide for Radiation Protection in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology. Radiation Protection Series No. 14.1. Yallambie, Vic: ARPANSA; 2008 (approved by the Radiation Health Committee 16 July 2008; endorsed 8 August 2008). https://www.arpansa.gov.au/sites/default/files/legacy/pubs/rps/rps14_1.pdf
  12. Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy. Professional Practice Standards. ASMIRT; 2018 (footer “May 2018 | ESAP Review”). https://www.asmirt.org/media/371/371.pdf
  13. Benes G, Saade R, Fayad LM, Sponseller PD. Case of the false fracture: a report of a radiographic stitching error in a scoliosis patient. JBJS Case Connect. 2023;13(3). doi:10.2106/JBJS.CC.23.00104. PMID 37556572. Verified PubMed.
  14. BfArM (German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices). Urgent Safety Notice for the DX-D 100 mobile X-ray system, AGFA Healthcare. Reference 03022/13, 1 July 2013. https://bfarm.de/SharedDocs/Kundeninfos/EN/17/2013/03022-13_kundeninfo_en.html
  15. Brady Z, Scoullar H, Grinsted B, Ewert K, Kavnoudias H, Jarema A, Crocker J, Wills R, Houston G, Law M, Varma D. Technique, radiation safety and image quality for chest X-ray imaging through glass and in mobile settings during the COVID-19 pandemic. Phys Eng Sci Med 2020;43(3):765-779. doi:10.1007/s13246-020-00899-8. PMID 32662037; PMCID PMC7355508.
  16. British Institute of Radiology, Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine, Public Health England, Royal College of Radiologists, Society and College of Radiographers, Society for Radiological Protection. Guidance on using shielding on patients for diagnostic radiology applications. London: BIR; March 2020. Working party chair: Peter Hiles. Open access, CC BY 4.0. https://www.bir.org.uk/media/414334/final_patient_shielding_guidance.pdf
  17. Brookfield H, Manning-Stanley A, England A. Light beam diaphragm collimation errors and their effects on radiation dose for pelvic radiography. Radiol Technol 2015;86(4):379-391. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25835404/
  18. Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists. Best Practice Guidelines (web): 01.02.01 Patient identification (validated June 2023); 01.04.01 Markers and annotation (RTR) (validated June 2018); 02.01.01 Infection control (validated December 2019); 02.02.03 Pregnant patients (validated December 2019; page says it is under review); 02.02.06 Minimizing patient exposure (validated February 2021); 02.02.07 Radiation safety outside the department (RTR) (validated June 2018); 03.01.03 Appropriateness of mobile examinations (RTR) (validated June 2018); 05.01.01 Minimizing MRT exposure (validated 1 June 2012); 05.01.02 Pregnant MRTs (validated 16 October 2013; under review). Ottawa: CAMRT. https://camrt-bpg.ca/patient-management/patient-interactions/patient-identification/
  19. Care Quality Commission (agreed by the four UK IR(ME)R enforcing authorities). IR(ME)R: Notify us about an exposure; Notification codes, categories and criteria; When to investigate and notify the enforcing authority. Web guidance, updated 28 August 2024. https://www.cqc.org.uk/guidance-providers/ionising-radiation/ionising-radiation-medical-exposure-regulations-irmer/notify-us-about-exposure
  20. Chen WX, Su JP, Huang SH, Huang SR, Chou MC. Machine learning for optimizing mAs in KUB radiography with metal implants. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2026;27(2):e70493. doi:10.1002/acm2.70493
  21. Chung L, Kumar S, Oldfield J, Phillips M, Stratfold M. A clinical audit of anatomical side marker use in a pediatric medical imaging department: a quantitative and qualitative investigation. PLoS One. 2020;15(11):e0242594. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0242594. PMID 33232340; PMCID PMC7685512. Open access CC BY. Verified PubMed.
  22. Clunie D. Digital imaging. Chapter 16 in: Dance DR, Christofides S, Maidment ADA, McLean ID, Ng KH (technical eds). Diagnostic Radiology Physics: A Handbook for Teachers and Students. Vienna: IAEA; 2014. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub1564webNew-74666420.pdf
  23. Dance DR, Christofides S, Maidment ADA, McLean ID, Ng KH (technical editors). Diagnostic Radiology Physics: A Handbook for Teachers and Students. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2014. ISBN 978-92-0-131010-1. (STI/PUB/1564.) https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub1564webNew-74666420.pdf
  24. Dave JK, Jones AK, Fisher R, Hulme K, Rill L, Zamora D, Woodward A, Brady S, MacDougall RD, Goldman L, Lang S, Peck D, Apgar B, Shepard SJ, Uzenoff R, Willis C. Current state of practice regarding digital radiography exposure indicators and deviation indices: Report of AAPM Imaging Physics Committee Task Group 232. Med Phys. 2018;45(11):e1146-e1160. doi:10.1002/mp.13212. PMID 30255505. Verified PubMed 14 Oct 2026.
  25. Don S, MacDougall R, Strauss K, Moore QT, Goske MJ, Cohen M, Herrmann T, John SD, Noble L, Morrison G, Lehman L, Whiting BR. Image Gently campaign back to basics initiative: ten steps to help manage radiation dose in pediatric digital radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200(5):W431-W436. doi:10.2214/AJR.12.9895. PMID 23617510. Verified PubMed.
  26. European Commission. Criteria for Acceptability of Medical Radiological Equipment used in Diagnostic Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Radiotherapy. Radiation Protection No 162. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the EU; 2012. doi:10.2768/22561.
  27. European Commission. European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Diagnostic Radiographic Images. EUR 16260 EN. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; June 1996. ISBN 92-827-7284-5. Edited by the Study Group on Quality Criteria Development (Carmichael JHE, Maccia C, Moores BM, Oestmann JW, Schibilla H, Teunen D, Van Tiggelen R, Wall B). Reproduction authorised except for commercial purposes with source acknowledged (PDF p4). https://static.seram.es/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/129_eur16260.pdf
  28. Fischer U, Vosshenrich R, Grabbe E. [The tilted screen-cassette (“grid cut-off” effect). A problem of bedside thoracic diagnosis]. Rofo. 1992;157(3):275-278. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1033012. PMID 1391824. German. Verified PubMed.
  29. Gauntt DM, Barnes GT. An automatic and accurate x-ray tube focal spot/grid alignment system for mobile radiography: system description and alignment accuracy. Med Phys. 2010;37(12):6402-6410. doi:10.1118/1.3518085. PMID 21302797; PMCID PMC3003722. Verified PubMed.
  30. Gauntt DM, Ranger NT, Willis CE, et al. Acceptance Testing and Quality Control of Digital Radiographic Imaging Systems. The Report of AAPM Task Group 150 (AAPM Report No. 150). Alexandria, VA: AAPM; July 2024. ISBN 978-1-936366-20-0. https://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/TG-150_final.pdf
  31. Hayre CM, Blackman S, Eyden A, Carlton K. The use of digital side markers (DSMs) and cropping in digital radiography. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2019;50(2):234-242. doi:10.1016/j.jmir.2018.11.001. PMID 31176431. Verified PubMed.
  32. Health and Disability Commissioner (New Zealand). Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights, Right 5 (effective communication). https://www.hdc.org.nz/your-rights/about-the-code/code-of-health-and-disability-services-consumers-rights/
  33. Health and Disability Commissioner. Guidance on Open Disclosure Policies. Auckland: HDC; November 2019. https://www.hdc.org.nz/media/k2jjd3qj/guidance-on-open-disclosure-policies.pdf
  34. Health and Safety Executive. Work with ionising radiation. Ionising Radiations Regulations 2017. Approved Code of Practice and guidance. L121 (Second edition). HSE; 2018. https://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/books/l121.htm
  35. Health Canada. Safety Code 35: Safety Procedures for the Installation, Use and Control of X-ray Equipment in Large Medical Radiological Facilities (2024). Published 5 June 2024 (page modified 13 Nov 2024); replaces the 2008 revision. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/environmental-workplace-health/reports-publications/radiation/safety-code-35-safety-procedures-installation-use-control-equipment-large-medical-radiological-facilities-safety-code.html
  36. Health Protection Agency, The Royal College of Radiologists and the College of Radiographers. Protection of Pregnant Patients during Diagnostic Medical Exposures to Ionising Radiation. RCE-9. Chilton: HPA; March 2009. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7d9efa40f0b635051d048c/RCE-9_for_web.pdf
  37. Hegde HV, Annie IK, Joshi SK, Iyengar SS. A mysterious case of unusual computed radiographic imaging artefacts: a clinician’s dilemma. Indian J Anaesth. 2018;62(11):905-907. doi:10.4103/ija.IJA_255_18. PMID 30532331; PMCID PMC6236785. Verified PubMed.
  38. Hodnett R, Ngoga DG, Edwards RJ, Singleton WGB. False impression of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt catheter fracture in a stitched X-ray image. BMJ Case Rep. 2025;18(3):e264312. doi:10.1136/bcr-2024-264312. PMID 40132939. Verified PubMed.
  39. Hofmann B, Rosanowsky TB, Jensen C, Wah KH. Image rejects in general direct digital radiography. Acta Radiol Open. 2015;4(10):2058460115604339. doi:10.1177/2058460115604339. PMID 26500784; PMCID PMC4601124. Verified PubMed.
  40. Image Gently Alliance (Alliance for Radiation Safety in Pediatric Imaging). “Image Gently and Digital Radiography” (Procedures: Digital Radiography). Web page, copyright 2025 Image Gently and SPR; undated content; read 14 Oct 2026. https://www.imagegently.org/Procedures/Digital-Radiography
  41. Imaging Physics, CancerCare Manitoba. Equipment Quality Control for Digital Radiography. Winnipeg: CancerCare Manitoba; May 10, 2019. 10 pp. https://cancercare.mb.ca/export/sites/default/Research/.galleries/files/imaging-physics-files/Digital-radiography-QC-guidance-May-10-2019.pdf
  42. International Atomic Energy Agency, Radiation Protection of Patients (RPOP). Radiation protection of children in radiology: frequently asked questions by health professionals. Web page; undated. https://www.iaea.org/resources/rpop/health-professionals/radiology/children
  43. International Atomic Energy Agency. Handbook of Basic Quality Control Tests for Diagnostic Radiology. IAEA Human Health Series No. 47. Vienna: IAEA; 2023. STI/PUB/2021. doi:10.61092/iaea.rhjo-8d0u.
  44. International Atomic Energy Agency. Radiation Protection and Safety in Medical Uses of Ionizing Radiation. IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSG-46 (Specific Safety Guide). Jointly sponsored by IAEA, ILO, PAHO and WHO. Vienna: IAEA; 2018. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/PUB1775_web.pdf
  45. Ireland T, Perdomo A, Lee KL, Jones A, Barnes P, Greig T, Reynolds SE. ACPSEM position paper: recommendations for a digital general X-ray quality assurance program. Phys Eng Sci Med. 2024;47(3):789-812. doi:10.1007/s13246-024-01431-y. PMID 39133369; PMCID PMC11408574. CC BY 4.0.
  46. Jalamneh B, Taher A, Nassar I, Musleh T, Shamieh B. Pseudo-pneumothorax due to skin folds in a patient with pneumonia. Cureus. 2023;15(4):e37564. doi:10.7759/cureus.37564. PMID 37197126; PMCID PMC10184715. Verified PubMed.
  47. Kowalczyk N, Comer E. Exposure indicator degradation from CR plate processing delays. Radiol Technol. 2009;80(5):401-409. PMID 19457844. Verified PubMed.
  48. Kusk MW, Jensen JM, Gram EH, Nielsen J, Precht H. Anode heel effect: does it impact image quality in digital radiography? A systematic literature review. Radiography (Lond). 2021;27(3):976-981. doi:10.1016/j.radi.2021.02.014. PMID 33741222. Verified PubMed.
  49. Little KJ, Reiser IS, Apgar B, et al. AAPM task group report 305: Guidance for standardization of vendor-neutral reject analysis in radiography. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023;24(5):e13938. doi:10.1002/acm2.13938. PMID 36995917; PMCID PMC10161059.
  50. Martin CJ, Vassileva J, Vano E, Mahesh M, Ebdon-Jackson S, Ng KH, Frush DP, Loose R, Damilakis J. Unintended and accidental medical radiation exposures in radiology: guidelines on investigation and prevention. J Radiol Prot. 2017;37(4):883-906. doi:10.1088/1361-6498/aa881e. PMID 28836506.
  51. Modica MJ, Kanal KM, Gunn ML. The obese emergency patient: imaging challenges and solutions. RadioGraphics 2011;31(3):811-23. doi:10.1148/rg.313105138. PMID 21571658.
  52. Mothiram U, Brennan PC, Lewis SJ, Moran B, Robinson J. Digital radiography exposure indices: a review. J Med Radiat Sci. 2014;61(2):112-118. doi:10.1002/jmrs.49. PMID 26229645; PMCID PMC4175837. Open access CC BY-NC. Verified PubMed.
  53. Mraity HAAB, Walton L, England A, Thompson J, Lanca L, Hogg P. Can the anode heel effect be used to optimise radiation dose and image quality for AP pelvis radiography? Radiography (Lond). 2020;26(2):e103-e108. doi:10.1016/j.radi.2019.11.094. PMID 32052763. Verified PubMed.
  54. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. NCRP Recommendations for Ending Routine Gonadal Shielding During Abdominal and Pelvic Radiography. NCRP Statement No. 13. Bethesda, MD: NCRP; 12 January 2021. https://ncrponline.org/wp-content/themes/ncrp/PDFs/Statement13.pdf
  55. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Head injury: assessment and early management. NICE guideline NG232. London: NICE; published 18 May 2023. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng232/chapter/Recommendations
  56. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Spinal injury: assessment and initial management. NICE guideline NG41. London: NICE; published 17 February 2016. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng41/chapter/Recommendations
  57. NEMA. DICOM PS3.4 2026d: Service Class Specifications. Annex J (Storage Commitment Service Class) and Annex K (Basic Worklist Management Service Class). https://dicom.nema.org/medical/dicom/current/output/html/part04.html
  58. Office of Radiation Safety, Ministry of Health (Manatū Hauora). Code of Practice for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology: ORS C1. Wellington: Ministry of Health; issued and in force 1 December 2024. Issued under s 86 of the Radiation Safety Act 2016. https://health.govt.nz/system/files/2024-11/Code-of-Practice-for-Diagnostic-and-Interventional-Radiology-ORS-C1.pdf
  59. Radiation Safety Act 2016 (New Zealand), Public Act 2016 No 6, version as at 4 September 2026: section 9, section 20 and Schedule 3. https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2016/0006/latest/DLM6339693.html
  60. Schaefer-Prokop C, Neitzel U, Venema HW, Uffmann M, Prokop M. Digital chest radiography: an update on modern technology, dose containment and control of image quality. Eur Radiol. 2008;18(9):1818-1830. doi:10.1007/s00330-008-0948-3. PMID 18431577; PMCID PMC2516181. Open access (CC BY-NC). Verified PubMed.
  61. Seibert JA (chair), Bogucki TM, Ciona T, Huda W, Karellas A, Mercier JR, Samei E, Shepard SJ, Stewart BK, Strauss KJ, Suleiman OH, Tucker D, Uzenoff RA, Weiser JC, Willis CE. Acceptance Testing and Quality Control of Photostimulable Storage Phosphor Imaging Systems. AAPM Report No. 93, Report of AAPM Task Group 10. College Park, MD: American Association of Physicists in Medicine; October 2006. ISBN-13 978-1-888340-64-8. https://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/RPT_93.pdf
  62. Seibert JA, Morin RL. The standardized exposure index for digital radiography: an opportunity for optimization of radiation dose to the pediatric population. Pediatr Radiol. 2011;41(5):573-581. doi:10.1007/s00247-010-1954-6. PMID 21491197; PMCID PMC3076558. Open access (CC BY-NC). Verified PubMed 14 Oct 2026.
  63. Shepard SJ, Lin P-JP, et al. AAPM Report No. 74: Quality Control in Diagnostic Radiology. Report of Task Group #12, Diagnostic X-ray Imaging Committee. Madison, WI: Medical Physics Publishing for AAPM; July 2002. https://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/RPT_74.pdf
  64. Shepard SJ, Wang J, Flynn M, Gingold E, Goldman L, Krugh K, Leong DL, Mah E, Ogden K, Peck D, Samei E, Wang J, Willis CE. An exposure indicator for digital radiography: AAPM Task Group 116 (executive summary). Med Phys. 2009;36(7):2898-2914. doi:10.1118/1.3121505. PMID 19673189; PMCID PMC3908678. (Verified on PubMed esummary 14 Oct 2026.)
  65. Society and College of Radiographers. Use of anatomical side markers. Policy statement, published 7 May 2014 (responsible person Susan Johnson); web page states it was reviewed by the Diagnostic Imaging Advisory Group in 2024 and “affirmed as recommended best practice”. https://www.sor.org/learning-advice/professional-body-guidance-and-publications/documents-and-publications/policy-guidance-document-library/use-of-anatomical-side-markers
  66. Society of Radiographers. Health Care Associated Infections (HCAIs): Practical guidance and advice. First edition. London: SoR; November 2006. https://www.sor.org/getmedia/b2c9806f-6905-40a4-8926-9424311cc997/sor_health_care_associated.pdf_1
  67. Stephenson-Smith B, Neep MJ, Rowntree P. Digital radiography reject analysis of examinations with multiple rejects: an Australian emergency imaging department clinical audit. J Med Radiat Sci. 2021;68(3):245-252. doi:10.1002/jmrs.468. PMID 33826800; PMCID PMC8424327. Verified PubMed.
  68. The Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2017 (SI 2017/1322), revised text incorporating SI 2024/896. Extent E+W+S; Northern Ireland has IR(ME)R (NI) 2018 (not read). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2017/1322/regulation/2
  69. The Royal College of Radiologists. IR(ME)R: Implications for clinical practice in diagnostic imaging, interventional radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine, second edition. London: RCR; August 2026. https://www.rcr.ac.uk/media/s1sdu4cq/rcr-publications-ir-me-r-implications-for-clinical-practice-in-diagnostic-imaging-interventional-radiology-and-diagnostic-nuclear-medicine-second-edition.pdf
  70. The Royal College of Radiologists. Which side is which? [QSI Ref: XR-503]. Audit recipe; published 17 March 2008, last reviewed 11 February 2021 (from Clinical Audit in Radiology 100+ recipes, RCR 1996, updated by CRAQIC). https://www.rcr.ac.uk/media/prgbn5xr/rcr-audits_which-side-is-which-qsi-ref-xr-503-_february-2021.docx
  71. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) adverse event reports and Medical Device Recall database, queried through the openFDA API (device/event and device/recall endpoints). Product codes: IZL “System, X-Ray, Mobile” (21 CFR 892.1720); MQB “Solid State X-Ray Imager (Flat Panel/Digital Imager)” (892.1680). https://api.fda.gov/device/event.json?search=device.device_report_product_code:IZL+AND+event_type:Injury
  72. Uppot RN. Technical challenges of imaging & image-guided interventions in obese patients. Br J Radiol 2018;91(1089):20170931. doi:10.1259/bjr.20170931. PMCID PMC6223172.
  73. US Food and Drug Administration. Medical Device Recalls database, product codes IZL (System, X-ray, Mobile) and MQB (solid state X-ray imager / flat panel), queried through the openFDA device recall API; two records also read on the FDA recall web page (Z-2590-2021, Z-0800-2015). https://api.fda.gov/device/recall.json?search=product_code:IZL
  74. Walz-Flannigan AI, Brossoit KJ, Magnuson DJ, Schueler BA. Pictorial review of digital radiography artifacts. RadioGraphics. 2018;38(3):833-846. doi:10.1148/rg.2018170038. PMID 29676963. Verified PubMed.
  75. Willis CE, Vinogradskiy YY, Lofton BK, White RA. Gain and offset calibration reduces variation in exposure-dependent SNR among systems with identical digital flat-panel detectors. Med Phys. 2011;38(7):4422-4429. doi:10.1118/1.3602458. PMID 21859043; PMCID PMC3965338 (full text not retrieved). Verified PubMed.
  76. Yanch JC, Behrman RH, Hendricks MJ, McCall JH. Increased radiation dose to overweight and obese patients from radiographic examinations. Radiology 2009;252(1):128-39. doi:10.1148/radiol.2521080141. PMID 19403846.

Keep going

Everything on X-ray & CT: X-ray & CT hub. Or search the whole reference.

Educational reference for imaging professionals. It does not replace local policy, manufacturer labelling or clinical judgement.

Contents